Carson Strong

46 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

Carson Strong
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 168
  • Reproductive Medicine 67
  • General Health Professions 189
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 210
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 31
Replace C Strong with:
C Strong United States
Kathryn Ehrich United Kingdom
Katie Featherstone United Kingdom
Michele Goodwin United States
Sandi Dheensa United Kingdom
Hubert Doucet Canada
Janet Malek United States
G. R. Dunstan United Kingdom
Lisa Campo‐Engelstein United States
Edmund G. Howe United States
Carson Strong relative to C Strong United States C Strong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
C Strong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carson Strong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carson Strong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carson Strong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carson Strong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carson Strong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carson Strong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carson Strong. The network helps show where Carson Strong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Carson Strong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carson Strong Line = papers co-authored together Carson Strong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993108
2
How should risks and benefits be balanced in research involving pregnant women and fetuses?
201270
3 200042
4 198629
5 198826
6 200322
7 198419
8 199917
9 199816
10 201015
11 199914
12 201113
13 198712
14 198312
15 200511
16 200110
17 19839
18 20058
19 20038
20 20067

About Carson Strong

Carson Strong is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (21 papers), Ethics in medical practice (18 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (8 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (168 citations), Reproductive Medicine (67 citations), General Health Professions (189 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (210 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (31 citations). Carson Strong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Thomas E. Elkins, Jeffrey P. Phelan, Susan R. Johnson, Alan R. Wolfe, Douglas Brown, Paul N. Black, Shannon Brown, Kathy Kinlaw, Howard R. Horn and Stephanie Scott. Their work appears in journals such as Metamedicine, The Hastings Center Report, The Journal of Clinical Ethics, The American Journal of Bioethics and The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact