Janet Malek

41 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers

Janet Malek
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • General Health Professions 178
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 176
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 111
  • Pharmacy 22
Replace Ruth Horn with:
Ruth Horn United Kingdom
Denise M. Dudzinski United States
Evelyne Shuster United States
Marcel Mertz Germany
Maryam Vahidi Iran
Kayhan Parsi United States
Gil Siegal Israel
Lisa Campo‐Engelstein United States
Bruce D. Weinstein United States
Faisal Malik United States
Janet Malek relative to Ruth Horn United Kingdom Ruth Horn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Ruth Horn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Malek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Malek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Malek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Malek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Malek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Malek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Malek. The network helps show where Janet Malek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Malek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Malek Line = papers co-authored together Janet Malek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015131
2 200042
3 201735
4 201628
5 201925
6 201021
7 202121
8 202021
9 200919
10 201018
11 201818
12 201212
13 201710
14 20179
15 20229
16 20118
17 20247
18 20067
19 20195
20 20195

About Janet Malek

Janet Malek is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 45 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (18 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (18 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (4 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (4 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (178 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (176 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (111 citations) and Pharmacy (22 citations). Janet Malek has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gail Geller, Laurence B. McCullough, David J. Doukas, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Clarence H. Braddock, Joseph A. Carrese, Katie Watson, Michael J. Green, Jeremy Sugarman and Amy L. McGuire. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Bioethics, Genetics in Medicine, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, The Journal of Clinical Ethics and Accountability in Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact