Caroline Griffith
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders 2
-
- Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods 2
- Co-authors
- Vivian P. Ta (2 shared papers)Garry McDowell (2 shared papers)Richard Body (2 shared papers)Brian George Keevil (2 shared papers)Finlay MacKenzie (1 shared paper)S. K. Hall (1 shared paper)Simon David Carley (1 shared paper)Stuart J. Moat (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Neonatal Screening (2 papers)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)Clinica Chimica Acta (1 paper)Bioanalysis (1 paper)Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Caroline Griffith
7 papers receiving 355 citations
Caroline Griffith's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Applied Psychology 118
- Health Informatics 12
- Social Psychology 91
- Safety Research 29
- Human-Computer Interaction 20
Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Griffith
This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Griffith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Griffith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Griffith. The network helps show where Caroline Griffith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Griffith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | User Experiences of Social Support From Companion Chatbots in Everyday Contexts: Thematic Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 296 |
| 2 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 2 |
About Caroline Griffith
Caroline Griffith is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Immunology, Human-Computer Interaction, Hematology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 7 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Media Influence and Health (1 paper), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (1 paper), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (1 paper) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (118 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations), Social Psychology (91 citations), Safety Research (29 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (20 citations). Caroline Griffith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vivian P. Ta, Garry McDowell, Richard Body, Brian George Keevil, Finlay MacKenzie, S. K. Hall, Simon David Carley, Stuart J. Moat, Kevin C Mackway-Jones and Lesley J. Tetlow. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Neonatal Screening, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Clinica Chimica Acta, Bioanalysis and Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.