Carl Hoefer

40 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Carl Hoefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • History and Philosophy of Science 459
  • Theoretical Computer Science 48
  • Philosophy 213
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 207
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 228
Replace Richard Healey with:
Richard Healey United States
Frank Arntzenius United States
Mauro Dorato Italy
Miklós Rédei Hungary
Nick Huggett United States
Gordon Belot United States
Storrs McCall Canada
Frederik Müller Netherlands
Wayne C. Myrvold Canada
Simon Saunders United Kingdom
Carl Hoefer relative to Richard Healey United States Richard Healey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Richard Healey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carl Hoefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Hoefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Hoefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Hoefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carl Hoefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Hoefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Hoefer. The network helps show where Carl Hoefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Carl Hoefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carl Hoefer Line = papers co-authored together Carl Hoefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007131
2 1996120
3 1994102
4 200054
5 199444
6 201033
7 201332
8 199827
9 200325
10
Absolute and Relational Theories of Space and Motion
200620
11 201919
12 202018
13 200018
14 199716
15 201815
16 200213
17 202012
18 200510
19 20199
20 20107

About Carl Hoefer

Carl Hoefer is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (26 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (18 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (2 papers) and Biofield Effects and Biophysics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (459 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (48 citations), Philosophy (213 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (207 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (228 citations). Carl Hoefer has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Rosenberg, Roman Frigg, Genoveva Martí, Nick Huggett, Chris Smeenk, Alexander Krauß, James Read, Christopher Ray, Mauro Dorato and Nancy Cartwright. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Philosophy of Science, European Journal for Philosophy of Science and Mind.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact