Carl Bode

32 papers receiving 98 citations

Peers

Carl Bode
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Music 12
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
  • Literature and Literary Theory 33
  • History 25
  • Marketing 19
Replace Milton Meltzer with:
Milton Meltzer United States
Alexander Cowie
Edward Wagenknecht United States
George Breitman
Mary Helen Washington
Louis D. Rubin United States
Hugh Barbour United States
Harriet Beecher Stowe Brunei
Stuart A. Selby Canada
Christin J. Mamiya United States
Carl Bode relative to Milton Meltzer United States Milton Meltzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Milton Meltzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carl Bode

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Bode's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Bode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Bode more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carl Bode

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Bode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Bode. The network helps show where Carl Bode may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Carl Bode, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carl Bode Line = papers co-authored together Carl Bode links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195731
2 195913
3 19609
4
Die zweite Lebenshälfte - Psychologische Perspektiven: Ergebnisse des Alters-Survey [The second half of life: Psychological perspectives - Findings of the German aging survey]
20018
5 19578
6 19796
7 19676
8
Highlights of American Literature.
19956
9 19565
10 19605
11 19585
12 19635
13 19644
14 19584
15 19594
16 19683
17 19543
18 19563
19
Ragged Dick ; and, Struggling upward
19852
20
American perspectives : the United States in the modern age
19902

About Carl Bode

Carl Bode is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Information Systems, Literature and Literary Theory, Marketing and Gender Studies, having authored 52 papers that have together received 162 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thoreau and American Literature (8 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), American History and Culture (4 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), American Literature and Humor Studies (3 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers) and Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (12 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (33 citations), History (25 citations) and Marketing (19 citations). Carl Bode has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Harvey Wish, Walter Harding, Robert M. Blum, Freya Dittmann‐Kohli, Merle Curti, Gerben J. Westerhof, Henry David Thoreau, J. A. Phillips, Robert E. Riegel and William H. Gilman. Their work appears in journals such as American Quarterly, The Modern Language Review, The American Historical Review, American Literature and The New England Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact