Candice Ho

658 citations
16 papers · 297 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Candice Ho

16 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Candice Ho
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Ophthalmology 174
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 145
  • Epidemiology 119
  • Pharmaceutical Science 19
  • Molecular Biology 100
Replace A. A. Voskresenskaya with:
A. A. Voskresenskaya Russia
Ying-Bo Shui United States
Salvador Mérida Spain
Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk Germany
M. Zirm Switzerland
Ezequiel Campos‐Mollo Spain
Orla Galvin United Kingdom
Evelyn Longhin Italy
Elyse J. McGlumphy United States
Sevil Karaman Erdur Türkiye
Candice Ho relative to A. A. Voskresenskaya Russia A. A. Voskresenskaya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
A. A. Voskresenskaya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Candice Ho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Candice Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candice Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candice Ho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Candice Ho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candice Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candice Ho. The network helps show where Candice Ho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Candice Ho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Candice Ho Line = papers co-authored together Candice Ho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201378
2 201464
3 201834
4 202124
5 200922
6 201922
7 201119
8 202011
9 20219
10 20235
11 20213
12 20232
13 20221
14
Expression of Muscarinic Receptors and Matrix Metalloproteinases in Muscarinic Receptor Mutant Mouse Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Their Role in Experimental Myopia
20101
15
Plekha7 knock out (KO) rats show an altered ocular barrier function
20211
16 20231

About Candice Ho

Candice Ho is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 16 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers), Connexins and lens biology (1 paper) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (174 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (145 citations), Epidemiology (119 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (19 citations) and Molecular Biology (100 citations). Candice Ho has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Veluchamy A. Barathi, Chee Wai Wong, Gert Storm, Tina Wong, Michael Poidinger, Roger W. Beuerman, Shyam S. Chaurasia, Lei Zhou, Dechao Tian and P. Michael Iuvone. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Scientific Reports, Biomolecules, The American Journal of Human Genetics and Journal of Proteome Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact