Tin A. Tun

2.6k citations
96 papers · 1.8k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Tin A. Tun

87 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Tin A. Tun
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Ophthalmology 1.2k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 685
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Biomedical Engineering 234
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 106
Replace Ce Zheng with:
Ce Zheng China
Massimo A. Fazio United States
Mathias Maier Germany
Atsuya Miki Japan
Hitoshi Tabuchi Japan
Akram Belghith United States
Alberto Diniz‐Filho United States
Meixiao Shen China
Baptiste Coudrillier United States
Jong Chul Han South Korea
Tin A. Tun relative to Ce Zheng China Ce Zheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Ce Zheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tin A. Tun

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tin A. Tun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tin A. Tun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tin A. Tun more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tin A. Tun

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tin A. Tun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tin A. Tun. The network helps show where Tin A. Tun may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tin A. Tun, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tin A. Tun Line = papers co-authored together Tin A. Tun links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018146
2 2019106
3 201384
4 201680
5 201054
6 201354
7 201350
8 201246
9 201343
10 201539
11 202038
12 201835
13 201233
14 201532
15 201332
16 201632
17 201929
18 201929
19 201029
20 201428

About Tin A. Tun

Tin A. Tun is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (69 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (10 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (9 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (6 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.2k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (685 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Biomedical Engineering (234 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (106 citations). Tin A. Tun has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Tin Aung, Mani Baskaran, Shamira Perera, Michaël J. A. Girard, Nicholas G. Strouthidis, David S. Friedman, Monisha E. Nongpiur, Ching‐Yu Cheng, Alexandre H. Thiéry and Ce Zheng. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Glaucoma, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact