Camilo Rocha

33 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers

Camilo Rocha
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Software 15
  • Management Information Systems 34
  • Information Systems 83
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 52
  • Artificial Intelligence 78
Replace Gwen Salaün with:
Gwen Salaün France
Rudolf Schlatte Norway
Søren Debois Denmark
Bořivoj Melichar Czechia
Ramtin Khosravi Iran
Saroj Ratnoo India
Matteo Camilli Italy
Claude Girault France
E. Yu. Pavlenko Russia
Maja D’Hondt Belgium
Camilo Rocha relative to Gwen Salaün France Gwen Salaün's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Gwen Salaün · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Camilo Rocha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Camilo Rocha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Camilo Rocha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Camilo Rocha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Camilo Rocha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Camilo Rocha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Camilo Rocha. The network helps show where Camilo Rocha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Camilo Rocha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Camilo Rocha Line = papers co-authored together Camilo Rocha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201664
2 201626
3 201812
4
Symbolic reachability analysis for rewrite theories
20139
5 20227
6 20217
7 20197
8 20196
9 20225
10 20225
11 20055
12 20224
13 20194
14 20154
15 20143
16 20213
17
Five Isomorphic Boolean Theories and Four Equational Decision Procedures
20073
18 20093
19 20072
20 20092

About Camilo Rocha

Camilo Rocha is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications and Molecular Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (14 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (14 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (5 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (4 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (4 papers) and Gene expression and cancer classification (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (15 citations), Management Information Systems (34 citations), Information Systems (83 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (52 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (78 citations). Camilo Rocha has collaborated with scholars based in Colombia, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include José Meseguer, César Muñoz, Francisco Durán, Jorge Finke, Gwen Salaün, Kyungmin Bae, Luis Tobòn, Mathias Lorieux, Celine Vens and Ning Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, Science of Computer Programming, Applied Network Science, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical and BMC Bioinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact