Camille Smith

736 citations
11 papers · 418 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Camille Smith

11 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Camille Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Clinical Psychology 159
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 65
  • Speech and Hearing 21
  • General Health Professions 77
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 28
Replace William Martínez with:
William Martínez United States
Hannah Bryson Australia
Marissa A. Feldman United States
Elizabeth Donovan United States
Wajeeha Mahmood Pakistan
Richard Ssegonja Sweden
Ana Cecília Oliveira Brazil
Robyn A. Cree United States
Taraneh Shojaei France
Alicia Bazzano United States
Camille Smith relative to William Martínez United States William Martínez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
William Martínez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Camille Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Camille Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Camille Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Camille Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Camille Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Camille Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Camille Smith. The network helps show where Camille Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Camille Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Camille Smith Line = papers co-authored together Camille Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2018171
2 2016109
3
Screening for developmental delays among young children--National Survey of Children's Health, United States, 2007.
201435
4 201930
5 201823
6 201815
7 201814
8 202011
9 20176
10 20202
11 20202

About Camille Smith

Camille Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper), Public Health and Social Inequalities (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (159 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (65 citations), Speech and Hearing (21 citations), General Health Professions (77 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (28 citations). Camille Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Lara R. Robinson, Joseph R. Holbrook, Jennifer Wyatt Kaminski, Rebecca H. Bitsko, Georgina Peacock, Melissa L. Danielson, Robyn A. Cree, Mary Kay Kenney, Reem M. Ghandour and Stephen J. Blumberg. Their work appears in journals such as MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, Preventing Chronic Disease, Maternal and Child Health Journal and Infants & Young Children.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact