Infants & Young Children

952 papers and 14.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 952 papers published in Infants & Young Children in the last decades have received a total of 14.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Infants & Young Children usually cover Clinical Psychology (634 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (319 papers) and Education (250 papers) specifically the topics of Family and Disability Support Research (530 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (278 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (177 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Infants & Young Children are Winnie Dunn, Michael J. Guralnick, Christina Corsello, Deborah J. Fidler, Carl J. Dunst, Walter Gilliam, Mary Spagnola, Barbara H. Fiese, Brooke Ingersoll and Ann P. Turnbull.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Infants & Young Children

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Infants & Young Children. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Infants & Young Children.

Countries where authors publish in Infants & Young Children

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Infants & Young Children. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Infants & Young Children with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Infants & Young Children more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025