C.A.M. de Wit
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 7
-
- Early Childhood Education and Development 3
- Child Development and Digital Technology 1
- Education Discipline and Inequality 1
- Co-authors
- Remy A. Hirasing (1 shared paper)Marcel F. van der Wal (1 shared paper)Ron H. J. Scholte (1 shared paper)Cornelis F. M. van Lieshout (1 shared paper)Marcel A. G. van Aken (1 shared paper)J. Marianne Riksen‐Walraven (2 shared papers)Eric E. J. De Bruyn (2 shared papers)Pier J. M. Prins (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- PEDIATRICS (1 paper)Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (1 paper)Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1 paper)Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (1 paper)Kind en adolescent (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
C.A.M. de Wit
6 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Social Psychology 340
- Clinical Psychology 261
- Safety Research 68
- Health 57
- Education 134
Countries citing papers authored by C.A.M. de Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of C.A.M. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.A.M. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.A.M. de Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.A.M. de Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.A.M. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.A.M. de Wit. The network helps show where C.A.M. de Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside C.A.M. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 348 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 5 | Angst in ontwikkelings-psychopathologisch perspectief. / Anxiety from the developmental psychopathology perspective. | 1997 | 4 |
| 6 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 1 |
About C.A.M. de Wit
C.A.M. de Wit is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology, Pharmacy and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 7 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Infant Health and Development (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper) and Education Discipline and Inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (340 citations), Clinical Psychology (261 citations), Safety Research (68 citations), Health (57 citations) and Education (134 citations). C.A.M. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Remy A. Hirasing, Marcel F. van der Wal, Ron H. J. Scholte, Cornelis F. M. van Lieshout, Marcel A. G. van Aken, J. Marianne Riksen‐Walraven, Eric E. J. De Bruyn, Pier J. M. Prins and Paul P. Goudena. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Kind en adolescent.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.