Cain Todd

755 citations
21 papers · 208 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
    • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis

Papers in

Cain Todd

18 papers receiving 184 citations

Peers

Cain Todd
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Philosophy 69
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 110
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 6
  • History and Philosophy of Science 14
Replace Dustin Stokes with:
Dustin Stokes United States
Margherita Arcangeli France
Matthew Fulkerson United States
Michael Pauen Germany
Johannes L. Brandl Austria
Tyler Doggett United States
Andrew Geeves Australia
Susanna Siegel United States
John Schwenkler United States
Luca Barlassina United Kingdom
Cain Todd relative to Dustin Stokes United States Dustin Stokes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dustin Stokes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cain Todd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cain Todd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cain Todd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cain Todd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cain Todd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cain Todd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cain Todd. The network helps show where Cain Todd may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200343
2 200829
3 200828
4 200427
5 201424
6
The Philosophy of Wine: A Case of Truth, Beauty, and Intoxication
201112
7 20128
8 20116
9 20126
10 20105
11 20045
12 20184
13 20143
14 20173
15
The transhistorical image:philosophizing art and its history
20032
16 20181
17
Imagination, expressiveness, and expression in the Case of Wine
20121
18 20071
19 20230
20 20120

About Cain Todd

Cain Todd is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 21 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (5 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (4 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (3 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (2 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (69 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (55 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (6 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations). Cain Todd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Ghana. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Aesthetics, Synthese, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, The Monist and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact