Cain Todd

781 citations
30 papers · 339 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
    • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis

Papers in

    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 8
    • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 7
    • Embodied and Extended Cognition 3
    • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art 6

Cain Todd

25 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Cain Todd
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Philosophy 113
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 151
  • History and Philosophy of Science 39
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
  • Theoretical Computer Science 6
Replace Elisabeth Schellekens with:
Elisabeth Schellekens Sweden
Dustin Stokes United States
Peter Lamont United Kingdom
Margherita Arcangeli France
Alexandre Métraux France
Regina E. Fabry Germany
Johannes L. Brandl Austria
Angela Mendelovici Canada
Dieter Lohmar Germany
Íngrid Vendrell Ferran Germany
Cain Todd relative to Elisabeth Schellekens Sweden Elisabeth Schellekens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Elisabeth Schellekens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cain Todd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cain Todd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cain Todd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cain Todd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cain Todd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cain Todd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cain Todd. The network helps show where Cain Todd may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200367
2 201135
3 200834
4 200432
5 200832
6 201429
7 200914
8
The Philosophy of Wine: A Case of Truth, Beauty, and Intoxication
201113
9 201210
10 200910
11 20107
12 20147
13 20047
14 20126
15 20176
16 20206
17 20185
18 20144
19
The transhistorical image:philosophizing art and its history
20033
20 20073

About Cain Todd

Cain Todd is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (7 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (6 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers) and Wine Industry and Tourism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (113 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (151 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (39 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (6 citations). Cain Todd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Ghana. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Aesthetics, Synthese, Philosophy Compass, Philosophical Studies and Metascience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact