C.A. Hendrie

860 citations
30 papers · 736 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

C.A. Hendrie

30 papers receiving 666 citations

Peers

C.A. Hendrie
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 131
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 382
  • Small Animals 73
  • Developmental Biology 14
  • Physiology 125
Replace Philip M. Wall with:
Philip M. Wall Canada
Bert Siegfried Switzerland
Ernest Hȧrd Sweden
Caroline L Van den Berg Netherlands
Raúl Aguilar Spain
Marília Barros Brazil
Luis Gil Spain
Mark A. Hebert United States
Annemoon M. M. van Erp Netherlands
Pierre Chapillon France
C.A. Hendrie relative to Philip M. Wall Canada Philip M. Wall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Philip M. Wall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.A. Hendrie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.A. Hendrie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.A. Hendrie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.A. Hendrie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.A. Hendrie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.A. Hendrie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.A. Hendrie. The network helps show where C.A. Hendrie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside C.A. Hendrie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.A. Hendrie Line = papers co-authored together C.A. Hendrie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983116
2 198779
3 199674
4 199360
5 198335
6 199733
7 198332
8 199130
9 198228
10 199124
11
On the role of endogenous opioid mechanisms in offense, defense and nociception.
198423
12 198823
13 198921
14 199821
15 200919
16 198415
17 200915
18 199212
19 200312
20 200912

About C.A. Hendrie

C.A. Hendrie is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 736 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (11 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (10 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (7 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (131 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (382 citations), Small Animals (73 citations), Developmental Biology (14 citations) and Physiology (125 citations). C.A. Hendrie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include R. John Rodgers, Joanna Caroline Neill, Susan L. Bennett, David Eilam, Scott Μ. Weiss, B. Costall, Maureen E Kelly, R.J. Naylor, Nicola Jayne Starkey and Colin Trevor Dourish. Their work appears in journals such as Physiology & Behavior, Neuropharmacology, Aggressive Behavior, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact