C. Schall
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Neurology top 10%
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 1
- Redox biology and oxidative stress 1
- Biochemical and Molecular Research 1
-
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Thilo Stehle (4 shared papers)Philipp J. Kahle (2 shared papers)Inge Unsöld (1 shared paper)Georg Zocher (1 shared paper)Shu‐Ming Li (1 shared paper)Ute Metzger (1 shared paper)Lutz Heide (1 shared paper)Stephanie Weber (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)Journal of Neurochemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
C. Schall
5 papers receiving 457 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Pharmacology 148
- Neurology 112
- Molecular Biology 284
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 35
- Neurology 25
Countries citing papers authored by C. Schall
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Schall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Schall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Schall more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Schall
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Schall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Schall. The network helps show where C. Schall may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside C. Schall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 176 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 126 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 76 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 10 |
About C. Schall
C. Schall is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Pharmacology, Oncology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 5 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (1 paper), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (1 paper), Redox biology and oxidative stress (1 paper), Biochemical and Molecular Research (1 paper) and Fungal Biology and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (148 citations), Neurology (112 citations), Molecular Biology (284 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (35 citations) and Neurology (25 citations). C. Schall has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Thilo Stehle, Philipp J. Kahle, Inge Unsöld, Georg Zocher, Shu‐Ming Li, Ute Metzger, Lutz Heide, Stephanie Weber, Hidenori Ichijo and Karin Görner. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neurochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.