C. Polop

871 citations
49 papers · 765 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

C. Polop

48 papers receiving 760 citations

Peers

C. Polop
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 353
  • Computational Mechanics 115
  • Mechanics of Materials 99
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 26
  • Condensed Matter Physics 36
Replace J. Żuk with:
J. Żuk Poland
Enrique Vasco Spain
Laurent Roux France
B. X. Liu China
David T. Hodul United States
B.X. Liu China
Hexiang Han China
Manuel Fernandez Italy
L. J. Huang Canada
J. M. Molarius Finland
C. Polop relative to J. Żuk Poland J. Żuk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
J. Żuk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Polop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Polop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Polop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Polop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Polop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Polop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Polop. The network helps show where C. Polop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Polop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Polop Line = papers co-authored together C. Polop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200752
2 200345
3 200437
4 200937
5 201337
6 200234
7 202031
8 200129
9 200329
10 199826
11 200225
12 201124
13 201724
14 202122
15 199920
16 199819
17 200319
18 200118
19 200116
20 200316

About C. Polop

C. Polop is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 49 papers that have together received 765 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (25 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (7 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films (7 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (5 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (5 papers), Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (4 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (2 papers) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (353 citations), Computational Mechanics (115 citations), Mechanics of Materials (99 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (26 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (36 citations). C. Polop has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Enrique Vasco, J. L. Sacedón, José Ángel Martín-Gago, Thomas Michely, Carsten Busse, Udo Linke, Carmen Ocal, Sebastian Bleikamp, Celia Rogero and Karsten Albe. Their work appears in journals such as Surface Science, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, Applied Physics Letters and Acta Materialia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact