C. Nash

1.2k citations
41 papers · 626 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C. Nash

40 papers receiving 555 citations

Peers

C. Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 244
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 198
  • Mathematical Physics 141
  • Modeling and Simulation 38
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 121
Replace Piotr Kielanowski with:
Piotr Kielanowski Mexico
В. И. Фущич Ukraine
Floyd L. Williams United States
A. G. Nikitin Ukraine
C. J. Howls United Kingdom
G. Soliani Italy
A.K. Common United Kingdom
Oktay K. Pashaev Türkiye
Wolfgang Lay Germany
E. Montaldi Italy
C. Nash relative to Piotr Kielanowski Mexico Piotr Kielanowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Piotr Kielanowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Nash. The network helps show where C. Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside C. Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Nash Line = papers co-authored together C. Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986235
2
Relativistic quantum fields
197851
3
Differential Topology and Quantum Field Theory
199136
4 199927
5 199522
6 197118
7
Degeneracy of zero modes of the Dirac operator in three dimensions
200016
8 200016
9 199914
10 199214
11 197312
12 198711
13 198610
14 200210
15 200010
16 20169
17 19929
18 19878
19 20098
20 20008

About C. Nash

C. Nash is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (10 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (7 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (7 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers), Quantum many-body systems (5 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (5 papers) and Topological Materials and Phenomena (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (244 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (198 citations), Mathematical Physics (141 citations), Modeling and Simulation (38 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (121 citations). C. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Siddhartha Sen, John Stachel, C. Adam, Bruno Muratori, Denjoe O’Connor, G. C. Joshi, Brian P. Dolan, R.L. Kingsley, Carl M. Bender and Gayatri Joshi. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Communications in Mathematical Physics, Physics Letters B, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact