C. Gung

1.0k citations
63 papers · 682 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

C. Gung

61 papers receiving 665 citations

Peers

C. Gung
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 247
  • Aerospace Engineering 398
  • Biomedical Engineering 441
  • Condensed Matter Physics 115
  • Radiation 59
Replace R. Gallix with:
R. Gallix France
T. Obana Japan
P. Titus United States
C. Sborchia France
N. Martovetsky United States
Francesca Cau Spain
A.M. Fuchs Switzerland
S. Wu China
T. Brown United States
K. Kizu Japan
C. Gung relative to R. Gallix France R. Gallix's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
R. Gallix · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Gung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Gung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Gung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Gung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Gung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Gung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Gung. The network helps show where C. Gung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Gung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Gung Line = papers co-authored together C. Gung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986108
2 201350
3 201041
4 200532
5 201124
6 199323
7 198922
8 201222
9 200922
10 198621
11 200820
12 199716
13 201115
14 198914
15 200513
16 201313
17 201712
18 201112
19 200912
20 201611

About C. Gung

C. Gung is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 63 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (58 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (35 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (30 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (13 papers), Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission (8 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers) and High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (247 citations), Aerospace Engineering (398 citations), Biomedical Engineering (441 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (115 citations) and Radiation (59 citations). C. Gung has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include J.V. Minervini, Kyuchul Shin, Erik Vold, Mohamed Abdou, M. Takayasu, N. Martovetsky, N. Mitchell, A. Devred, Xiongyi Huang and Philip C. Michael. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Fusion Engineering and Design, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Cryogenics and Laser and Particle Beams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact