Philip C. Michael

2.7k citations
107 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Philip C. Michael

102 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Philip C. Michael
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Condensed Matter Physics 632
  • Otorhinolaryngology 96
  • Biomedical Engineering 820
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 185
  • Aerospace Engineering 254
Replace S. Miyata with:
S. Miyata Japan
A. Wong-Foy United States
W.D. Markiewicz United States
T.A. Painter United States
Taizo Tosaka Japan
M. Takeo Japan
Zhaoyun Duan China
A. Iwamoto Japan
L.F. Goodrich United States
Thibault Lécrevisse France
Philip C. Michael relative to S. Miyata Japan S. Miyata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
S. Miyata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Michael

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Michael's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Michael with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Michael more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Michael

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Michael. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Michael. The network helps show where Philip C. Michael may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip C. Michael, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip C. Michael Line = papers co-authored together Philip C. Michael links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201980
2 201974
3 200772
4 202165
5 201650
6 199143
7 201942
8 201641
9 200140
10 200634
11 201931
12 201627
13 200926
14 200626
15 202025
16 201724
17 201623
18 198922
19 201718
20 200817

About Philip C. Michael

Philip C. Michael is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 107 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (80 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (36 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (35 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (31 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (15 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (13 papers), Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology (7 papers) and Tribology and Wear Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (632 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (96 citations), Biomedical Engineering (820 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (185 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (254 citations). Philip C. Michael has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Y. Iwasa, Juan Bascuñán, Vivek Raut, Seungyong Hahn, Dong Keun Park, Jiho Lee, E. Rabinowicz, J.V. Minervini, Yi Li and Timing Qu. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Cryogenics, Wear, Superconductor Science and Technology and Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact