C. A. Federer

5.1k citations
51 papers · 3.9k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

C. A. Federer

51 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

C. A. Federer
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.2k
  • Soil Science 874
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 953
  • Water Science and Technology 976
  • Environmental Chemistry 544
Replace C. Wayne Martin with:
C. Wayne Martin United States
R. J. Luxmoore United States
James W. Hornbeck United States
G. Stanhill Israel
Masakazu Suzuki Japan
Todd M. Scanlon United States
Francisco Domingo Spain
William A. Dugas United States
Francis M. Kelliher New Zealand
Juan Bellot Spain
C. A. Federer relative to C. Wayne Martin United States C. Wayne Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
C. Wayne Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. A. Federer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. A. Federer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. A. Federer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. A. Federer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. A. Federer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. A. Federer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. A. Federer. The network helps show where C. A. Federer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. A. Federer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. A. Federer Line = papers co-authored together C. A. Federer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992465
2 1998362
3 1989278
4 1995278
5 1996218
6 1979199
7 1966149
8 2003142
9 2000142
10 1993137
11 1983127
12 198497
13 198294
14 197088
15 198682
16 199981
17 197375
18 199174
19
Brook: A Hydrologic Simulation Model for Eastern Forests
197872
20 198268

About C. A. Federer

C. A. Federer is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Water Science and Technology and Atmospheric Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (25 papers), Forest ecology and management (16 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (10 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (9 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (6 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (6 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (5 papers) and Soil and Unsaturated Flow (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (2.2k citations), Soil Science (874 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (953 citations), Water Science and Technology (976 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (544 citations). C. A. Federer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John D. Aber, Charles J Vörösmarty, James W. Hornbeck, Annette L. Schloss, B M Fekete, C. Wayne Martin, C. T. Smith, C. B. Tanner, Robert S. Pierce and C. J. Vörösmarty. Their work appears in journals such as Water Resources Research, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Ecology, Forest Science and Soil Science Society of America Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact