Burkhard Schroeter

1.4k citations
24 papers · 969 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Burkhard Schroeter

24 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers

Burkhard Schroeter
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 808
  • Ecology 503
  • Atmospheric Science 214
  • Ecological Modeling 29
  • Plant Science 248
Replace T.G. Allan Green with:
T.G. Allan Green New Zealand
T. G. Allan Green New Zealand
B. Schroeter Germany
T. G. A. Green New Zealand
H. Zellner Germany
E. Kilian Germany
María J. Cano Spain
Halina Bednarek-Ochyra Poland
Gert Helms Germany
Wilfred B. Schofield Canada
Burkhard Schroeter relative to T.G. Allan Green New Zealand T.G. Allan Green's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
T.G. Allan Green · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Burkhard Schroeter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Burkhard Schroeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Burkhard Schroeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Burkhard Schroeter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Burkhard Schroeter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Burkhard Schroeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Burkhard Schroeter. The network helps show where Burkhard Schroeter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Burkhard Schroeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Burkhard Schroeter Line = papers co-authored together Burkhard Schroeter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200387
2 201478
3 200372
4 199568
5 199567
6 201160
7 200557
8 200257
9 199552
10 199945
11 200244
12 200540
13 201040
14 201035
15 201034
16 201334
17 200132
18
New Aspects in Cryptogamic Research
200022
19 199914
20 201711

About Burkhard Schroeter

Burkhard Schroeter is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Plant Science and Oceanography, having authored 24 papers that have together received 969 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lichen and fungal ecology (20 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (14 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (12 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (7 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (808 citations), Ecology (503 citations), Atmospheric Science (214 citations), Ecological Modeling (29 citations) and Plant Science (248 citations). Burkhard Schroeter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Leopoldo G. Sancho, M. Schlensog, T. G. Allan Green, Christoph Scheidegger, Stefan Pannewitz, Ana Pintado, T.G. Allan Green, Roman Türk, L. Kappen and Beat Frey. Their work appears in journals such as Antarctic Science, Polar Biology, Oecologia, New Phytologist and Biodiversity and Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact