Thomas Peer

21 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Thomas Peer
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 199
  • Pollution 92
  • Dermatology 43
  • Soil Science 41
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 37
Replace Xinyu Jiang with:
Xinyu Jiang China
Diego Bonaldo Genuário Brazil
Tanja Mrak Slovenia
Tanja Žuna Pfeiffer Croatia
Cédric Gonneau France
William D. McIlveen United States
Lutz Wittenmayer Germany
Kevin J. Stevens Canada
Gintarė Sujetovienė Lithuania
Glenda L. Singleton United States
Thomas Peer relative to Xinyu Jiang China Xinyu Jiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Xinyu Jiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Peer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Peer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Peer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Peer. The network helps show where Thomas Peer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Peer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Peer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Peer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201490
2 201379
3 201472
4 201145
5
Biochemie des Bodens
199736
6 200936
7 200833
8 200730
9 200825
10 201124
11 200121
12 201720
13 200515
14 201012
15 20218
16 20226
17 20085
18 20125
19
The Highland Steppes of the Hindukush Range as Indicators of Centuries Old Pasture Farming
20004
20
Das Verhalten von Radiocäsium in Weiderasen der Hohen Tauern (Salzburg, Austria)
19943

About Thomas Peer

Thomas Peer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Pollution, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 21 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (5 papers), Heavy metals in environment (4 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (2 papers), Chromium effects and bioremediation (2 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (2 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (1 paper) and Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (199 citations), Pollution (92 citations), Dermatology (43 citations), Soil Science (41 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (37 citations). Thomas Peer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Stefanie Maier, Martín Grube, Ursula Lütz‐Meindl, Roman Türk, Farrukh Hussain, Viktoria Wagner, Thomas Schmidt, Manfred Sager, Johann Wolfgang Bauer and Peter Steinbacher. Their work appears in journals such as Water Air & Soil Pollution, Biodiversity and Conservation, Environmental and Experimental Botany, Plant and Soil and Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact