Thomas Peer
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
-
- Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
- Lichen and fungal ecology
Papers in
-
- Lichen and fungal ecology 7
- Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology 5
- Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies 4
-
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 5
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 3
- Co-authors
- Kris Verheyen (6 shared papers)Bart Muys (5 shared papers)Quentin Ponette (4 shared papers)Martín Grube (3 shared papers)Stefanie Maier (3 shared papers)Ursula Lütz‐Meindl (2 shared papers)Roman Türk (2 shared papers)Farrukh Hussain (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Peer
27 papers receiving 697 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 196
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 257
- Environmental Chemistry 86
- Pollution 91
- Global and Planetary Change 148
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Peer
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Peer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Peer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Peer. The network helps show where Thomas Peer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Peer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 78 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 55 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 33 | |
| 9 | Biochemie des Bodens | 1997 | 32 |
| 10 | 2009 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 21 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 9 |
About Thomas Peer
Thomas Peer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Pollution and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 28 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lichen and fungal ecology (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (5 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (5 papers), Forest ecology and management (5 papers), Heavy metals in environment (4 papers), Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (196 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (257 citations), Environmental Chemistry (86 citations), Pollution (91 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (148 citations). Thomas Peer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kris Verheyen, Bart Muys, Quentin Ponette, Martín Grube, Stefanie Maier, Ursula Lütz‐Meindl, Roman Türk, Farrukh Hussain, Thomas Schmidt and Vincent Kint. Their work appears in journals such as Water Air & Soil Pollution, Forest Ecology and Management, Biodiversity and Conservation, Experimental Dermatology and Restoration Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.