This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Sprat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Sprat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Sprat more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Sprat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Sprat. The network helps show where Thomas Sprat may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Sprat, linked wherever they
have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers
they share.
Border = papers with Thomas SpratLine = papers co-authored togetherThomas Sprat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)·Thomas Sprat
2001
203
About Thomas Sprat
Thomas Sprat is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry, Surgery, Communication and Small Animals, having authored 2 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (161 citations), Anthropology (74 citations), History (61 citations), Philosophy (64 citations) and Museology (16 citations). Frequent co-authors include Jackson I. Cope and Richard F. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Notes and Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.