Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 20212024 · 296 citations
What are hit papers?
Paper score: A paper's citations measured against the top-1% bar of its own field and year: the square root of citations ÷ bar, so 1 means right at the bar and 2 means four times its citations. The bar blends the citation counts that enter the top 1% of the paper's subfields in its year (weighted 89.5%), of those subfields over all years (0.5%) and of its year across all fields (10%); a subfield and year with fewer than 400 papers takes its year's bar. Papers from 2026 are not scored yet: in an unfinished year, when a paper appeared matters more than how it is cited.
Hit paper: A paper cited at least 1.5× the top-1% bar of its field and year: a paper score of at least √1.5.
Countries citing papers authored by Bronte E Dalton
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bronte E Dalton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bronte E Dalton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bronte E Dalton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bronte E Dalton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bronte E Dalton. The network helps show where Bronte E Dalton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Bronte E Dalton, linked wherever they
have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers
they share.
Border = papers with Bronte E DaltonLine = papers co-authored togetherBronte E Dalton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
All Works
5 of 5 papers shown
#
Work
1
Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
Bronte E Dalton is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and General Health Professions, having authored 5 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (1 paper), Healthcare Systems and Practices (1 paper), Global Maternal and Child Health (1 paper), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (1 paper), Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (761 citations), Rehabilitation (136 citations), Nephrology (115 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (45 citations) and Physiology (312 citations). Bronte E Dalton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Ricardo Toledo‐Crow, Roisin Commane, Luke D. Schiferl and Cong Cao. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The Lancet Neurology and Atmospheric chemistry and physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.