Brock Matter

1.2k citations
30 papers · 927 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

    • DNA Repair Mechanisms 4
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 3
    • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 3
    • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 9

Brock Matter

28 papers receiving 914 citations

Peers

Brock Matter
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 82
  • Cancer Research 188
  • Inorganic Chemistry 183
  • Organic Chemistry 296
  • Pharmaceutical Science 41
Replace Fazlul Huq with:
Fazlul Huq Australia
Y. R. Santosh Laxmi United States
Jun Ishihara Japan
Francesco Paolo Invidiata Italy
Guangxun Li China
Eva Falomir Spain
Sung Hwan Kim South Korea
Kempegowda Mantelingu India
Hongji Li China
Jinggong Liu China
Brock Matter relative to Fazlul Huq Australia Fazlul Huq's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Fazlul Huq · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brock Matter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brock Matter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brock Matter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brock Matter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brock Matter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brock Matter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brock Matter. The network helps show where Brock Matter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brock Matter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brock Matter Line = papers co-authored together Brock Matter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997171
2 199894
3 200675
4 200572
5 200264
6 200647
7 200444
8 201443
9 201133
10 201031
11 200130
12 201823
13 201523
14 200723
15 201922
16 201121
17 202320
18 201419
19 201715
20 202014

About Brock Matter

Brock Matter is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Organic Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Spectroscopy, having authored 30 papers that have together received 927 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (9 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers), Potato Plant Research (4 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (82 citations), Cancer Research (188 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (183 citations), Organic Chemistry (296 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (41 citations). Brock Matter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Natalia Tretyakova, Douglas R. Powell, Roger A. Jones, Charles P. Casey, Bernd Proft, Lisa A. Peterson, Choua C. Vu, Lori M. Petrovich, Danuta Malejka‐Giganti and A. Saari Csallany. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Research in Toxicology, Pharmaceutics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, AAPS PharmSciTech and Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact