Brian MacNeil

31 papers receiving 950 citations

Peers

Brian MacNeil
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Rehabilitation 227
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 91
  • Neurology 114
  • Biological Psychiatry 32
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 64
Replace Débora da Luz Scheffer with:
Débora da Luz Scheffer Brazil
Marion U. Goebel Germany
De‐Yong Liang United States
Sarah J. Doran United States
Kurt D. Ackerman United States
Donald Staines Australia
Lesley J. White United States
Qun Zhang China
Christiana Zingler Germany
Michael A. Pezzone United States
Brian MacNeil relative to Débora da Luz Scheffer Brazil Débora da Luz Scheffer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Débora da Luz Scheffer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian MacNeil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian MacNeil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian MacNeil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian MacNeil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian MacNeil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian MacNeil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian MacNeil. The network helps show where Brian MacNeil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian MacNeil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian MacNeil Line = papers co-authored together Brian MacNeil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007133
2 199086
3 200984
4 199367
5 200358
6 199153
7 199350
8 199650
9 201339
10 199739
11
Exercise training and tumour metastasis in mice: influence of time of exercise onset.
199438
12 201331
13 200328
14 201127
15 201426
16 201522
17 199219
18 199219
19 200316
20 200215

About Brian MacNeil

Brian MacNeil is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Behavioral Neuroscience, Physiology, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Exercise and Physiological Responses (7 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (227 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (91 citations), Neurology (114 citations), Biological Psychiatry (32 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (64 citations). Brian MacNeil has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Laurie Hoffman‐Goetz, Kent T. HayGlass, Anita L. Kozyrskyj, Y. Arumugam, Allan B. Becker, Alexandra C. Kendall, M. E. Houston, D.M. Nance, Xiao‐Mei Mai and Harry B. Greenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Journal of Applied Physiology, Brain Behavior and Immunity, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology and International Journal of Sports Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact