Brian Gee

1.0k citations
30 papers · 383 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Ambix (2 papers)Annals of Science (1 paper)Physics Education (8 papers)Nuncius (1 paper)Physics Bulletin (13 papers)
Partner nations
United Kingdom

In The Last Decade

Brian Gee

21 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Brian Gee
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • History and Philosophy of Science 134
  • Theoretical Computer Science 12
  • General Psychology 6
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 56
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 60
Replace Roger H. Stuewer with:
Roger H. Stuewer United States
A. S. Eddinǵton United Kingdom
Michel Paty France
Frank A. J. L. James United Kingdom
Russell McCormmach United States
Jed Z. Buchwald United States
L. Pearce Williams United States
Peter Kosso United States
Jarrett Leplin United States
C. A. Hooker Canada
Brian Gee relative to Roger H. Stuewer United States Roger H. Stuewer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Roger H. Stuewer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Gee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Gee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Gee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Gee. The network helps show where Brian Gee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Brian Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Gee Line = papers co-authored together Brian Gee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979198
2 197830
3
The Origin of Practical Work in the English School Science Curriculum.
199229
4 198222
5 197821
6 198413
7 197512
8 198511
9 19939
10 19876
11 19696
12 19915
13 19854
14 19703
15 19903
16 19772
17
Astronomy in School Science.
19791
18 19741
19 19761
20 20161

About Brian Gee

Brian Gee is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Anthropology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Education, having authored 30 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Developments in Astronomy (5 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (3 papers), Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Australian Indigenous Culture and History (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (134 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations), General Psychology (6 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (56 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (60 citations). Brian Gee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William H. Brock. Their work appears in journals such as Ambix, Annals of Science, Physics Education, Nuncius and Physics Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact