Brad W. Smith

2.7k citations
50 papers · 2.0k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Brad W. Smith

50 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Brad W. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Health 533
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.2k
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.4k
  • Gender Studies 191
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 169
Replace Ni He with:
Ni He United States
Dennis P. Rosenbaum United States
Bitna Kim United States
John R. Hepburn United States
Robin S. Engel United States
Justin Nix United States
Gennaro F. Vito United States
Edward R. Maguire United States
Robert E. Worden United States
Kyle McLean United States
Brad W. Smith relative to Ni He United States Ni He's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ni He · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brad W. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brad W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brad W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brad W. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brad W. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brad W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brad W. Smith. The network helps show where Brad W. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brad W. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brad W. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Brad W. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005168
2 2003153
3 2014151
4 2003112
5 2016104
6 2002103
7 201797
8 200493
9 200790
10 201086
11 200562
12 201855
13 201648
14 201547
15 200135
16 201631
17 200831
18 200530
19 201728
20 201127

About Brad W. Smith

Brad W. Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (30 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (28 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (15 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers) and Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (533 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.2k citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.4k citations), Gender Studies (191 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (169 citations). Brad W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and India. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm D. Holmes, James Frank, Kenneth J. Novak, Eric G. Lambert, Yuning Wu, Hanif Qureshi, Charles F. Klahm, Ivan Y. Sun, Wendy D. Lynch and Andrew J. Shatté. Their work appears in journals such as Policing An International Journal, Criminal Justice Review, Justice Quarterly, Crime & Delinquency and Police Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact