Bowen Hui

35 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Bowen Hui
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Computer Science Applications 47
  • Software 25
  • Human-Computer Interaction 31
  • Information Systems 121
  • Artificial Intelligence 149
Replace Nawaz Khan with:
Nawaz Khan United Kingdom
Johnson United States
Elis Montoro Hernandes Brazil
Vidya Rajaram United States
Meiliana Meiliana Indonesia
Michel Buffa France
André Di Thommazo Brazil
Hussan Munir Sweden
Cheryl Seals United States
Anarosa A. F. Brandão Brazil
Bowen Hui relative to Nawaz Khan United Kingdom Nawaz Khan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Nawaz Khan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bowen Hui

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bowen Hui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bowen Hui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bowen Hui more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bowen Hui

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bowen Hui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bowen Hui. The network helps show where Bowen Hui may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bowen Hui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bowen Hui Line = papers co-authored together Bowen Hui links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200487
2 199846
3 202246
4 201836
5 202126
6 202325
7 200622
8 202220
9 201713
10 200913
11 200411
12 20187
13 20207
14 20226
15 20206
16 20206
17 20083
18 20133
19 20083
20 20233

About Bowen Hui

Bowen Hui is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Management Information Systems, having authored 40 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (6 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (6 papers), Software Engineering Research (5 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (5 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (3 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (47 citations), Software (25 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations), Information Systems (121 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (149 citations). Bowen Hui has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sotirios Liaskos, John Mylopoulos, R.J. Campbell, Craig Boutilier, Xiangquan Zeng, Yu Xi, Xuejie Li, Xuejie Li, He Li and Huan Song. Their work appears in journals such as User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Data & Knowledge Engineering and Fuel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact