Borah Kim

1.3k citations
40 papers · 945 · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Borah Kim

39 papers receiving 901 citations

Peers

Borah Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Biological Psychiatry 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 268
  • Clinical Psychology 391
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 232
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
Replace Rebecca G. Fortgang with:
Rebecca G. Fortgang United States
Manish Dalwani United States
Jan‐Bernard C. Marsman Netherlands
Petra Dykierek Germany
Noam Soreni Canada
Karolina Leopold Germany
J.‐F. Allilaire France
Gb Cassano Italy
Jing Xiao China
Danielle L. Taylor United States
Borah Kim relative to Rebecca G. Fortgang United States Rebecca G. Fortgang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Rebecca G. Fortgang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Borah Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Borah Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Borah Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Borah Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Borah Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Borah Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Borah Kim. The network helps show where Borah Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Borah Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Borah Kim Line = papers co-authored together Borah Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009131
2 200898
3 200883
4 201066
5 201249
6 201042
7 201538
8 201637
9 201628
10 202125
11 202025
12 201225
13 201624
14 201422
15 201322
16 201320
17 200920
18 201420
19 201319
20 201219

About Borah Kim

Borah Kim is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 40 papers that have together received 945 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (4 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (54 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (268 citations), Clinical Psychology (391 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (232 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations). Borah Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Germany and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Sang‐Hyuk Lee, Tai Kiu Choi, Tae Kyou Choi, Keunyoung Yook, Shin Young Suh, Kang Soo Lee, Ki-Hwan Yook, Shin-Young Suh, Yong‐Woo Kim and Yong Woo Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, PLoS ONE, Psychiatry Research and General Hospital Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact