Bliss Cartwright
Impact in
- Law top 0.2%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations
- Legal principles and applications
- Law in Society and Culture
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Legal and Constitutional Studies
Papers in
-
- Legal and Constitutional Studies 3
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 3
- Law 4
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 4
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 1
- Co-authors
- Robert A. Kagan (4 shared papers)Stanton Wheeler (4 shared papers)Lawrence M. Friedman (4 shared papers)Gerrit Wolf (2 shared papers)Richard D. Schwartz (1 shared paper)John G. Maurer (1 shared paper)Marc Galanter (1 shared paper)Robert L. Kidder (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Law & Society Review (3 papers)Social Forces (2 papers)Psychological Bulletin (2 papers)Stanford Law Review (2 papers)Michigan Law Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Bliss Cartwright
12 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Law 273
- Economics and Econometrics 225
- Strategy and Management 56
- Political Science and International Relations 72
- Public Administration 9
Countries citing papers authored by Bliss Cartwright
This map shows the geographic impact of Bliss Cartwright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bliss Cartwright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bliss Cartwright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bliss Cartwright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bliss Cartwright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bliss Cartwright. The network helps show where Bliss Cartwright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Bliss Cartwright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 146 | |
| 2 | 1981 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 56 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 41 | |
| 5 | 1974 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1972 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1974 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1975 | 1 |
About Bliss Cartwright
Bliss Cartwright is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Law, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (1 paper), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper) and Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (273 citations), Economics and Econometrics (225 citations), Strategy and Management (56 citations), Political Science and International Relations (72 citations) and Public Administration (9 citations). Bliss Cartwright has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Kagan, Stanton Wheeler, Lawrence M. Friedman, Gerrit Wolf, Richard D. Schwartz, John G. Maurer, Marc Galanter, Robert L. Kidder, Fred Emery and Russell L. Ackoff. Their work appears in journals such as Law & Society Review, Social Forces, Psychological Bulletin, Stanford Law Review and Michigan Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.