Bliss Cartwright
Impact in
- Law top 0.5%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations
- Legal principles and applications
- Law in Society and Culture
- Criminal Law and Evidence
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Legal and Constitutional Studies
Papers in
- Law 4
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 4
-
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 3
- Legal and Constitutional Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Robert A. Kagan (4 shared papers)Lawrence M. Friedman (4 shared papers)Stanton Wheeler (4 shared papers)Richard D. Schwartz (1 shared paper)Gerrit Wolf (2 shared papers)John G. Maurer (1 shared paper)Marc S. Galanter (1 shared paper)Robert L. Kidder (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Law & Society Review (3 papers)Stanford Law Review (2 papers)Psychological Bulletin (2 papers)Law & Policy (1 paper)Michigan Law Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Bliss Cartwright
12 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Law 261
- Economics and Econometrics 208
- Strategy and Management 55
- Political Science and International Relations 69
- Public Administration 9
Countries citing papers authored by Bliss Cartwright
This map shows the geographic impact of Bliss Cartwright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bliss Cartwright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bliss Cartwright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bliss Cartwright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bliss Cartwright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bliss Cartwright. The network helps show where Bliss Cartwright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Bliss Cartwright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 138 | |
| 2 | 1981 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 40 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1974 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1972 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1974 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1973 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 1 |
About Bliss Cartwright
Bliss Cartwright is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 12 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (1 paper), Statistical Methods and Inference (1 paper) and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (261 citations), Economics and Econometrics (208 citations), Strategy and Management (55 citations), Political Science and International Relations (69 citations) and Public Administration (9 citations). Bliss Cartwright has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Kagan, Lawrence M. Friedman, Stanton Wheeler, Richard D. Schwartz, Gerrit Wolf, John G. Maurer, Marc S. Galanter, Robert L. Kidder, Fred E. Emery and Russell L. Ackoff. Their work appears in journals such as Law & Society Review, Stanford Law Review, Psychological Bulletin, Law & Policy and Michigan Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.