Lord Bingham

606 citations
6 papers · 332 · h-index 2

Impact in

  • Law top 0.5%
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
    • Law in Society and Culture
    • Multidisciplinary Warburg-centric Studies
    • Comparative and International Law Studies
    • International Law and Human Rights
    • European and International Law Studies

Papers in

Journals
Ecclesiastical Law Journal (1 paper)The Cambridge Law Journal (1 paper)King s Law Journal (1 paper)Alternative Law Journal (1 paper)Victoria University of Wellington Law Review (1 paper)
Partner nations
United KingdomThailand

In The Last Decade

Lord Bingham

5 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers

Lord Bingham
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Law 160
  • Political Science and International Relations 155
  • Sociology and Political Science 113
  • Strategy and Management 37
  • Economics and Econometrics 42
Replace John O. McGinnis with:
John O. McGinnis United States
Michael B. Dougan United Kingdom
Gerard W. Gawalt United States
Mikhail G. Filippov United States
Jacques deLisle United States
Kim Economides United Kingdom
Rick Richard Hasen United States
L. Neville Brown United Kingdom
Josef Esser Germany
John E. C. Brierley Canada
Lord Bingham relative to John O. McGinnis United States John O. McGinnis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
John O. McGinnis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lord Bingham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lord Bingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lord Bingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lord Bingham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lord Bingham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lord Bingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lord Bingham. The network helps show where Lord Bingham may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2007325
2 20083
3 20102
4 20051
5 20091
6 20090

About Lord Bingham

Lord Bingham is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Pharmacy, Accounting and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (1 paper), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Law, logistics, and international trade (1 paper), Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper), Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper) and International Law and Aviation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (160 citations), Political Science and International Relations (155 citations), Sociology and Political Science (113 citations), Strategy and Management (37 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (42 citations). Lord Bingham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Thailand. Their work appears in journals such as Ecclesiastical Law Journal, The Cambridge Law Journal, King s Law Journal, Alternative Law Journal and Victoria University of Wellington Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact