Birgit Loch

76 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers

Birgit Loch
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Modeling and Simulation 81
  • Computer Science Applications 87
  • Education 391
  • Media Technology 99
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 96
Replace Julie Gainsburg with:
Julie Gainsburg United States
Oh Nam Kwon South Korea
Noleine Fitzallen Australia
Christopher Haines United Kingdom
Stephen John Norton Australia
Morten Blomhøj Denmark
Jill Brown Australia
Zaleha Ismail Malaysia
Jonas Bergman Ärlebäck Sweden
Hans-Stefan Siller Germany
Birgit Loch relative to Julie Gainsburg United States Julie Gainsburg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Julie Gainsburg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Birgit Loch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Loch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Loch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Loch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Birgit Loch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Loch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Loch. The network helps show where Birgit Loch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Birgit Loch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Birgit Loch Line = papers co-authored together Birgit Loch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201739
2 201530
3 201330
4 201329
5 201128
6 200726
7 201324
8 201219
9 201619
10 200118
11 200518
12 200516
13 201516
14 201115
15 201415
16 201214
17 200914
18
Building lectures and building bridges with socio-economically disadvantaged students
201113
19 201213
20 200512

About Birgit Loch

Birgit Loch is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications, Modeling and Simulation, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 87 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (25 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (21 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (14 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (13 papers), Mathematics Education and Programs (13 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (9 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (8 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (81 citations), Computer Science Applications (87 citations), Education (391 citations), Media Technology (99 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (96 citations). Birgit Loch has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tony Croft, Linda Galligan, Christine V. McDonald, Diane Donovan, Ben Mestel, Ángel A. Juan, Jim Hanan, Τhanasis Daradoumis, Sebastián Ventura and Christopher C. Tisdell. Their work appears in journals such as Higher Education Research & Development, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Journal of Computational Physics, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education and Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact