Birgit Endraß

39 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Birgit Endraß
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Human-Computer Interaction 107
  • Social Psychology 290
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 104
  • Artificial Intelligence 266
  • Control and Systems Engineering 99
Replace Jillian Gerten with:
Jillian Gerten United States
Catharine Oertel Sweden
Marco Vala Portugal
Iwan de Kok Netherlands
Rachel Coulston United States
Katsuya Takanashi Japan
Tim Bickmore United States
Lisa Campbell United States
Mei Yii Lim United Kingdom
Heather Pon-Barry United States
Birgit Endraß relative to Jillian Gerten United States Jillian Gerten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Jillian Gerten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Birgit Endraß

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Endraß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Endraß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Endraß more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Birgit Endraß

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Endraß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Endraß. The network helps show where Birgit Endraß may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Birgit Endraß, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Birgit Endraß Line = papers co-authored together Birgit Endraß links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201251
2 201349
3 201043
4 200734
5 200934
6 201332
7 201125
8 200925
9 201221
10 201120
11 200917
12 201414
13 201314
14 201412
15 201412
16 201411
17 201010
18 20099
19 20098
20 20118

About Birgit Endraß

Birgit Endraß is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Control and Systems Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (18 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (12 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (9 papers), Human Motion and Animation (8 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (6 papers), AI in Service Interactions (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (107 citations), Social Psychology (290 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 citations), Artificial Intelligence (266 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (99 citations). Birgit Endraß has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Elisabeth André, Matthias Rehm, Ionuț Damian, Yukiko Nakano, Nikolaus Bee, Felix Kistler, Mohammad Obaid, Markus Häring, Hung‐Hsuan Huang and Toyoaki Nishida. Their work appears in journals such as AI & Society, Lecture notes in computer science, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games and International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact