Binh Do

22 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Binh Do
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Marketing 69
  • Business and International Management 14
  • Strategy and Management 77
  • Artificial Intelligence 107
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 84
Replace Petr Petera with:
Petr Petera Czechia
Lukas Theis Germany
Rongxin Chen China
Morten Lund Denmark
Klaus Marhold Austria
Feng Mei China
Klas Eriksson Sweden
Peng Liang China
Ali Sanayei Iran
Amparo Urbano Spain
Binh Do relative to Petr Petera Czechia Petr Petera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Petr Petera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Binh Do

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Binh Do's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Binh Do with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Binh Do more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Binh Do

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Binh Do. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Binh Do. The network helps show where Binh Do may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Binh Do, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Binh Do Line = papers co-authored together Binh Do links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200596
2 202154
3 202052
4 202421
5 202218
6 198715
7 200715
8 201913
9 199810
10 200810
11 20228
12 20228
13
Assessing competitiveness of foreign and local supermarket chains in Vietnamese market by using Fuzzy TOPSIS method
20116
14 20065
15 19994
16 20243
17 20033
18 20212
19 20251
20 20231

About Binh Do

Binh Do is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Marketing, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Information Systems and Management and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 27 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sustainable Supply Chain Management (6 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (6 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers), Global trade and economics (3 papers), International Business and FDI (3 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (3 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers) and Laser Material Processing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (69 citations), Business and International Management (14 citations), Strategy and Management (77 citations), Artificial Intelligence (107 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (84 citations). Binh Do has collaborated with scholars based in Vietnam, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ninh Nguyen, D. S. Elliott, Arthur K. Mills, Ephraim Fischbach, Michael A. Fischbach, Clare D’Souza, Benjamin M. Zwickl, S. L. Chuang, Mikko Söderlund and Hoàng Việt Nguyễn. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Sustainability, Review of Managerial Science, Benchmarking An International Journal and Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact