Bilha Schechter

2.4k citations
69 papers · 2.2k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Bilha Schechter

69 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Bilha Schechter
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 705
  • Immunology 437
  • Oncology 519
  • Modeling and Simulation 79
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
Replace David Geho with:
David Geho United States
Mohammad Rashidian United States
M. V. Pimm United Kingdom
Leslie A. Khawli United States
S.K. Huang United States
Susan L. Deutscher United States
Ruei‐Min Lu Taiwan
Richard H. Kimura United States
Sarah Shigdar Australia
Byron Ballou United States
Bilha Schechter relative to David Geho United States David Geho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
David Geho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bilha Schechter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bilha Schechter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bilha Schechter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bilha Schechter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bilha Schechter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bilha Schechter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bilha Schechter. The network helps show where Bilha Schechter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bilha Schechter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bilha Schechter Line = papers co-authored together Bilha Schechter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005211
2 2009152
3 2013147
4 1967136
5 200285
6 199082
7 198873
8 196668
9 199848
10 197147
11 197046
12 200744
13 199744
14 197643
15 197142
16 197640
17 199539
18 197138
19 199238
20 201338

About Bilha Schechter

Bilha Schechter is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Organic Chemistry and Immunology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (21 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (10 papers), Biotin and Related Studies (7 papers), Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications (7 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (7 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (6 papers), Ferrocene Chemistry and Applications (6 papers) and HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (705 citations), Immunology (437 citations), Oncology (519 citations), Modeling and Simulation (79 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.1k citations). Bilha Schechter has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Michael Sela, Ruth Arnon, Meir Wilchek, Israël Schechter, Yosef Yarden, Sara Lavi, Michaël Feldman, Zvia Agur, Tsipi Ben-Kasus and F. Borek. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Biochemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Immunology and European Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact