Bhash Naidoo

480 citations
15 papers · 238 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Bhash Naidoo

14 papers receiving 229 citations

Peers

Bhash Naidoo
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Economics and Econometrics 104
  • General Health Professions 81
  • Health 22
  • Applied Psychology 10
  • Transportation 10
Replace Kushal T. Kadakia with:
Kushal T. Kadakia United States
Kim Edmunds Australia
Shuli Qu China
Admassu N. Lamu Norway
Regina Greer-Smith United States
Randy Schwartz United States
Elizabeth C. Hamel United States
Beate S. Müller Germany
Stephen Rocks United Kingdom
Vikki O’Neill United Kingdom
Bhash Naidoo relative to Kushal T. Kadakia United States Kushal T. Kadakia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Kushal T. Kadakia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bhash Naidoo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bhash Naidoo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bhash Naidoo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bhash Naidoo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bhash Naidoo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bhash Naidoo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bhash Naidoo. The network helps show where Bhash Naidoo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bhash Naidoo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bhash Naidoo Line = papers co-authored together Bhash Naidoo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200733
2 202130
3 200228
4 200027
5 201526
6 201220
7 199719
8 201618
9 201315
10 201213
11 20143
12 20203
13 20212
14
Does Health Technology Assessment guidance give adequate consideration to decisions about less costly and less effective alternatives
20201
15 20240

About Bhash Naidoo

Bhash Naidoo is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health and Physiology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Global Health Care Issues (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper) and Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (104 citations), General Health Professions (81 citations), Health (22 citations), Applied Psychology (10 citations) and Transportation (10 citations). Bhash Naidoo has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Peter Littlejohns, Anthony J. Culyer, Kalipso Chalkidou, Duolao Wang, Colin Sanderson, Ian R. White, Paul Trueman, Margaret Thorogood, Sophie Beale and Kathryn McPherson. Their work appears in journals such as Health Care Management Science, Tobacco Control, Health Economics, European Journal of Public Health and The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact