Bev O. O'Connell

120 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Bev O. O'Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Research and Theory 59
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 62
  • Rehabilitation 269
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 180
  • Emergency Medicine 210
Replace Diane Lee Carroll with:
Diane Lee Carroll United States
Anne Williams Australia
Bridie Kent United Kingdom
Brenda H Roe United Kingdom
Neville E. Strumpf United States
Maria Matarese Italy
Yea‐Ing Lotus Shyu Taiwan
Sharon Tucker United States
Julie Johnson Zerwic United States
Sascha Köpke Germany
Bev O. O'Connell relative to Diane Lee Carroll United States Diane Lee Carroll's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Diane Lee Carroll · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bev O. O'Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bev O. O'Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bev O. O'Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bev O. O'Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bev O. O'Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bev O. O'Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bev O. O'Connell. The network helps show where Bev O. O'Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bev O. O'Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bev O. O'Connell Line = papers co-authored together Bev O. O'Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000161
2 200390
3 200577
4 200276
5 199976
6 200475
7 201273
8 201673
9 200172
10 200171
11 200868
12 200756
13 200756
14 200354
15 201043
16 200541
17 200840
18 201239
19 201336
20 201336

About Bev O. O'Connell

Bev O. O'Connell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Rheumatology, having authored 120 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (23 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (11 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (8 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (59 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (62 citations), Rehabilitation (269 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (180 citations) and Emergency Medicine (210 citations). Bev O. O'Connell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joan Ostaszkiewicz, Jeanne Young, Linda Baker, Helen Myers, Wendy Penney, Trisha Lynette Dunning, Cadeyrn J. Gaskin, Ben Edwards, Mary Therese Hawkins and Chantal F. Ski. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Nurse, International Journal of Nursing Practice, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia and Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact