Anne Williams

128 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Anne Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Research and Theory 132
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 47
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 115
  • General Health Professions 566
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 118
Replace Bev OʼConnell with:
Bev OʼConnell Australia
Isabel Higgins Australia
Lisbeth Fagerström Norway
Azita Emami Sweden
Carmel Bradshaw Ireland
Rhonda Nay Australia
Terry Fulmer United States
Daphne Stannard United States
Yea‐Ing Lotus Shyu Taiwan
Gail W. Stuart United States
Anne Williams relative to Bev OʼConnell Australia Bev OʼConnell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Bev OʼConnell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Williams. The network helps show where Anne Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Williams Line = papers co-authored together Anne Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 139 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199595
2 199895
3 200491
4 199989
5 200969
6 199568
7 199561
8 200660
9 201560
10 200659
11 200359
12 200154
13 200850
14 200549
15 200949
16 200146
17 199443
18 200741
19 200541
20 200840

About Anne Williams

Anne Williams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 139 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (14 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers), Nursing education and management (6 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (6 papers), Physical Education and Pedagogy (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (132 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (47 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (115 citations), General Health Professions (566 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (118 citations). Anne Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vera F. Irurita, Sue Atkins, Bonnie Sibbald, Jackie Oldham, Barbara Jack, Linda J. Kristjanson, Julie Bedward, Melanie Jones, V F Hillier and Di Twigg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Palliative Medicine, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact