Beth McIntosh

515 citations
18 papers · 338 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Beth McIntosh

17 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Beth McIntosh
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 262
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 85
  • Occupational Therapy 14
  • Clinical Psychology 48
Replace Liz Nathan with:
Liz Nathan United Kingdom
Pia Thomsen Denmark
Karina Carlesso Pagliarin Brazil
Megan Blossom United States
Tristan Mahr United States
Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel United States
Penelope K. Hall United States
Maggie Watson United States
Kakia Petinou Cyprus
Llorenç Andreu Spain
Beth McIntosh relative to Liz Nathan United Kingdom Liz Nathan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Liz Nathan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth McIntosh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth McIntosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth McIntosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth McIntosh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth McIntosh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth McIntosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth McIntosh. The network helps show where Beth McIntosh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Beth McIntosh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth McIntosh Line = papers co-authored together Beth McIntosh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200848
2 200739
3 200736
4 200832
5 200632
6 200928
7 200828
8 200824
9 200916
10 200815
11 200911
12 19928
13
Core Vocabulary intervention
20098
14
The quick test of language (for 4- and 5-year-olds)
20065
15 20235
16 20092
17
The effect of accurate speech production experience on the development of auditory-visual speech perception in children
20061
18 19890

About Beth McIntosh

Beth McIntosh is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education, having authored 18 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language Development and Disorders (13 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (262 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (85 citations), Occupational Therapy (14 citations) and Clinical Psychology (48 citations). Beth McIntosh has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Dodd, Sharon Crosbie, Alison Holm, Denis Burnham, Wendy L. Arnott, Siân Thomas, Helen Rigby, B. Dodd and Margaret M. Leahy. Their work appears in journals such as Child Language Teaching and Therapy, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Journal of Child Language and British Journal of Developmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact