Anthony Peter Passmore

88 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Anthony Peter Passmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Biological Psychiatry 135
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 161
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 672
  • Neurology 294
  • Family Practice 61
Replace Peter Passmore with:
Peter Passmore United Kingdom
Jacqueline Birks United Kingdom
John L. Reid United Kingdom
Hiroyuki Arai Japan
Hiroaki Araki Japan
Larry Ereshefsky United States
Alberto Pilotto Italy
Kenji Toba Japan
Joël Ménard France
Michael Bodmer Switzerland
Anthony Peter Passmore relative to Peter Passmore United Kingdom Peter Passmore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Peter Passmore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Peter Passmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Peter Passmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Peter Passmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Peter Passmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony Peter Passmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Peter Passmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Peter Passmore. The network helps show where Anthony Peter Passmore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anthony Peter Passmore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anthony Peter Passmore Line = papers co-authored together Anthony Peter Passmore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013296
2 2012227
3 2002186
4 2005165
5 2001155
6 1999152
7 2015137
8 2004115
9 199399
10 200999
11 200398
12 201594
13 201868
14 200666
15 200065
16
Dementia.
201559
17 200958
18 200556
19 199252
20 200650

About Anthony Peter Passmore

Anthony Peter Passmore is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (22 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (21 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (6 papers), Neurological Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (135 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (161 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (672 citations), Neurology (294 citations) and Family Practice (61 citations). Anthony Peter Passmore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Todd, David Craig, Stephen P. McIlroy, Bernadette McGuinness, Dominic Hart, Stephen A. Barr, Mark Roberts, Kevin Dynan, Carmel Hughes and John T. Lawson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, NeuroMolecular Medicine and Drugs & Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact