Beth Fordham

1.0k citations
25 papers · 669 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Beth Fordham

23 papers receiving 650 citations

Peers

Beth Fordham
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 104
  • Pharmacology 107
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Clinical Psychology 100
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
Replace Chris Griffiths with:
Chris Griffiths United Kingdom
M. Amir Israel
Esra Yazıcı Türkiye
Eduardo A. Colón United States
Jörg Bätzing Germany
Lisa K. McDaniel United States
Tasha Murphy United States
Sylvia van Beugen Netherlands
Sang-Dol Kim South Korea
Elizabeth Nicole Bush United States
Beth Fordham relative to Chris Griffiths United Kingdom Chris Griffiths's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Chris Griffiths · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Fordham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Fordham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Fordham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Fordham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Fordham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Fordham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Fordham. The network helps show where Beth Fordham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Fordham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Fordham Line = papers co-authored together Beth Fordham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016131
2 202192
3 201484
4 201869
5 201448
6 201741
7 202135
8 202229
9 201427
10 201825
11 201817
12 201517
13 201517
14 202211
15 20206
16 20224
17 20144
18 20203
19 20222
20 20252

About Beth Fordham

Beth Fordham is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Surgery, Economics and Econometrics and Clinical Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 669 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (104 citations), Pharmacology (107 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), Clinical Psychology (100 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (8 citations). Beth Fordham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sarah E Lamb, Bethan Copsey, Christine Bundy, C.E.M. Griffiths, Zafra Cooper, Zara Hansen, Esther Williamson, Helen Richmond, Amanda Häll and Thavapriya Sugavanam. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Health Technology Assessment, Patient Preference and Adherence, The Bone & Joint Journal and International Journal of Eating Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact