Beth Fordham

1.0k citations
23 papers · 635 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 3
    • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 3
    • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 6

Beth Fordham

22 papers receiving 620 citations

Peers

Beth Fordham
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 158
  • Pharmacology 149
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 60
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Clinical Psychology 123
Replace Francis Creed with:
Francis Creed United Kingdom
Carolina X. Sandler Australia
Leighann Litcher‐Kelly United States
Mark Kelson United Kingdom
Charles D. Petrie United States
Elizabeth Nicole Bush United States
Nanna Kurtze Norway
Cheryl Harris Canada
M. Amir Israel
Marianne B. Kool Netherlands
Beth Fordham relative to Francis Creed United Kingdom Francis Creed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Francis Creed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Fordham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Fordham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Fordham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Fordham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Fordham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Fordham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Fordham. The network helps show where Beth Fordham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Fordham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Fordham Line = papers co-authored together Beth Fordham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016128
2 202180
3 201480
4 201867
5 201447
6 201741
7 202132
8 202228
9 201427
10 201824
11 201517
12 201517
13 201815
14 20229
15 20205
16 20224
17 20144
18 20203
19 20212
20 20232

About Beth Fordham

Beth Fordham is a scholar working on Surgery, Pharmacology, Economics and Econometrics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (3 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (158 citations), Pharmacology (149 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (60 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations) and Clinical Psychology (123 citations). Beth Fordham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Sarah E Lamb, Christine Bundy, Bethan Copsey, C.E.M. Griffiths, Zafra Cooper, Zara Hansen, Helen Richmond, Esther Williamson, Amanda Häll and Ranjit Lall. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Health Technology Assessment, Patient Preference and Adherence, International Journal of Eating Disorders and Spine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact