Doris Schledermann

758 citations
31 papers · 388 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Doris Schledermann

28 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Doris Schledermann
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 118
  • Reproductive Medicine 81
  • Epidemiology 178
  • Oncology 50
  • Microbiology 9
Replace Christina Founta with:
Christina Founta United Kingdom
Brittany Lees United States
Claudio Gustavino Italy
Nithya Ratnavelu United Kingdom
Mayuyo Mori Japan
Mihai Emil Căpîlna Romania
Joseph D. Carreon United States
David Viveros‐Carreño Colombia
Julia K. Thurloe Australia
J.‐L. Mergui France
Doris Schledermann relative to Christina Founta United Kingdom Christina Founta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.7×
Christina Founta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Doris Schledermann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doris Schledermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doris Schledermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doris Schledermann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doris Schledermann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doris Schledermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doris Schledermann. The network helps show where Doris Schledermann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Doris Schledermann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Doris Schledermann Line = papers co-authored together Doris Schledermann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201249
2 200734
3 202130
4 201229
5 200625
6 201422
7 201620
8 201318
9 200816
10 202116
11 202114
12 201311
13 200411
14 202210
15 202210
16 202210
17 20139
18 20219
19 20228
20 20247

About Doris Schledermann

Doris Schledermann is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (16 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (9 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Genital Health and Disease (2 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (2 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (118 citations), Reproductive Medicine (81 citations), Epidemiology (178 citations), Oncology (50 citations) and Microbiology (9 citations). Doris Schledermann has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Netherlands and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Ole Mogensen, Sandra Elnegaard, Gitte Ørtoft, René dePont Christensen, Henrik Lajer, Kirsten Jochumsen, Marianne Andersen, Dorte Glintborg, Pernille Ravn and Pernille Tine Jensen. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, International Journal of Cancer, Gynecologic Oncology, Diagnostic Cytopathology and Acta Oncologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact