Benoît Creton

58 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Benoît Creton
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 221
  • Analytical Chemistry 207
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 228
  • Biomedical Engineering 511
  • Filtration and Separation 24
Replace Carlos Nieto‐Draghi with:
Carlos Nieto‐Draghi France
Kevin G. Joback United States
Leonidas Constantinou Denmark
Poorandokht Ilani‐Kashkouli South Africa
W. Vincent Wilding United States
Mehdi Sattari Iran
Pascal Mougin France
Alessandro Vetere Italy
Florence H. Vermeire Belgium
Piet D. Iedema Netherlands
Benoît Creton relative to Carlos Nieto‐Draghi France Carlos Nieto‐Draghi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Carlos Nieto‐Draghi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Creton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Creton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Creton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Creton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Creton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Creton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Creton. The network helps show where Benoît Creton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Creton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Creton Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Creton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015125
2 2011124
3 201290
4 201069
5 201362
6 201252
7 200846
8 201343
9 201241
10 200737
11 201237
12 201231
13 201630
14 201928
15 201327
16 201127
17 200824
18 201324
19 200824
20 201322

About Benoît Creton

Benoît Creton is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (25 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (12 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (11 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (10 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (7 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (7 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (6 papers) and Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (221 citations), Analytical Chemistry (207 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (228 citations), Biomedical Engineering (511 citations) and Filtration and Separation (24 citations). Benoît Creton has collaborated with scholars based in France, Denmark and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include B. Rousseau, Carlos Nieto‐Draghi, Pascal Mougin, Laurie Starck, Diego Alonso Saldana, Theodorus de Bruin, Véronique Lachet, Jean-Charles de Hemptinne, Nicolas Pannacci and Konstantin S. Smirnov. Their work appears in journals such as Energy & Fuels, Fluid Phase Equilibria, Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles, SAR and QSAR in environmental research and The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact