Benjamin Storek

618 citations
7 papers · 489 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 2
    • Viral-associated cancers and disorders 1

Benjamin Storek

7 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

Benjamin Storek
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Genetics 134
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 162
  • Neurology 82
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 86
  • Oncology 102
Replace Krzysztof Zakrzewski with:
Krzysztof Zakrzewski Poland
Debbie K. Song United States
Marco Puthenparampil Italy
Philippe Pencalet France
Jolanda Schieving Netherlands
M. Zurita Spain
Christopher A. Kerfoot United States
Gail D. Wenger United States
Jason S. Taub United States
Daniel G. Spomar United States
Benjamin Storek relative to Krzysztof Zakrzewski Poland Krzysztof Zakrzewski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Krzysztof Zakrzewski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Storek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Storek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Storek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Storek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Storek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Storek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Storek. The network helps show where Benjamin Storek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Storek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Storek Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Storek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2013207
2 2008107
3 200874
4 200648
5 201444
6 20218
7 20081

About Benjamin Storek

Benjamin Storek is a scholar working on Neurology, Oncology, Nephrology, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (1 paper), Renal function and acid-base balance (1 paper), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (1 paper), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (1 paper), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper) and Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (134 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (162 citations), Neurology (82 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (86 citations) and Oncology (102 citations). Benjamin Storek has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Hummel, John H. Morrison, William G.M. Janssen, Michaela S. Banck, Andreas S. Beutler, Cheng Wang, Peter Lenz, Hendrik Nogai, Bernd Dörken and Alexandar Tzankov. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular Pain, Neurology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Supportive Care in Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact