Benjamin R. Bates

105 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Benjamin R. Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Applied Psychology 98
  • Communication 126
  • Literature and Literary Theory 158
  • Sociology and Political Science 474
  • Virology 47
Replace Knud S. Larsen with:
Knud S. Larsen United States
Lois Stevenson United States
Alison Bish United Kingdom
Charles E. Rosenberg United States
Kami J. Silk United States
James K. Skipper United States
Sei‐Hill Kim United States
Roxanne Parrott United States
Kurt Neuwirth United States
Jessica Gall Myrick United States
Benjamin R. Bates relative to Knud S. Larsen United States Knud S. Larsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Knud S. Larsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin R. Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin R. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin R. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin R. Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin R. Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin R. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin R. Bates. The network helps show where Benjamin R. Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin R. Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin R. Bates Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin R. Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004124
2 2010123
3 2006118
4 200486
5 201277
6 200371
7
The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis and public perceptions of biomedical research: a focus group study.
200469
8 200456
9 202247
10 200344
11 200238
12 200536
13 200833
14 202031
15 201228
16 200427
17 201926
18 201825
19 201824
20 200824

About Benjamin R. Bates

Benjamin R. Bates is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 110 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (15 papers), Media Influence and Health (7 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (5 papers) and Race, Genetics, and Society (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (98 citations), Communication (126 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (158 citations), Sociology and Political Science (474 citations) and Virology (47 citations). Benjamin R. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ecuador and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Brian L. Quick, Celeste M. Condit, Tina M. Harris, Mario J. Grijalva, Jennifer L. Bevan, Rukhsana Ahmed, Margaret M. Quinlan, John Lynch, Alan R. Templeton and Paul Achter. Their work appears in journals such as Health Communication, Communication Studies, PLoS neglected tropical diseases, Frontiers in Communication and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact