Amber E. Boydstun

2.4k citations
46 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Amber E. Boydstun

44 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Amber E. Boydstun
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Communication 535
  • General Social Sciences 179
  • Political Science and International Relations 571
  • Strategy and Management 247
  • Sociology and Political Science 681
Replace Adam F. Simon with:
Adam F. Simon United States
John G. Geer United States
Dirk Oegema United States
Andreas Schuck Netherlands
Travis N. Ridout United States
Christian Baden Israel
Yanna Krupnikov United States
Marion R. Just United States
Eva Anduiza Spain
Mark Boukes Netherlands
Amber E. Boydstun relative to Adam F. Simon United States Adam F. Simon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Adam F. Simon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber E. Boydstun

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber E. Boydstun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber E. Boydstun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber E. Boydstun more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber E. Boydstun

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber E. Boydstun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber E. Boydstun. The network helps show where Amber E. Boydstun may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber E. Boydstun, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber E. Boydstun Line = papers co-authored together Amber E. Boydstun links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001197
2 2013185
3 2015136
4 2014136
5 2014109
6 2020104
7 201350
8 201250
9 201745
10 201840
11 201739
12 201639
13
Identifying Media Frames and Frame Dynamics Within and Across Policy Issues
201334
14 200833
15 201633
16 201431
17 201329
18 201325
19 201824
20 201723

About Amber E. Boydstun

Amber E. Boydstun is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Sociology and Political Science, General Social Sciences and Strategy and Management, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (17 papers), Social Media and Politics (14 papers), Media Studies and Communication (13 papers), Media Influence and Politics (9 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (9 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (7 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (6 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (535 citations), General Social Sciences (179 citations), Political Science and International Relations (571 citations), Strategy and Management (247 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (681 citations). Amber E. Boydstun has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca A. Glazier, Frank R. Baumgartner, Justin H. Gross, Stefaan Walgrave, Anne Hardy, Shaun Bevan, Herschel F. Thomas, Dallas Card, Noah A. Smith and Philip Resnik. Their work appears in journals such as Political Communication, Research & Politics, Mass Communication & Society, PS Political Science & Politics and Policy Studies Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact