Amber E. Boydstun

2.4k citations
41 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Amber E. Boydstun

40 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Amber E. Boydstun
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Communication 491
  • General Social Sciences 166
  • Political Science and International Relations 500
  • Sociology and Political Science 638
  • Strategy and Management 217
Replace John G. Geer with:
John G. Geer United States
Dirk Oegema United States
Adam F. Simon United States
Travis N. Ridout United States
Christian Baden Israel
Jane Suiter Ireland
Mark Boukes Netherlands
Andreas Schuck Netherlands
Eva Anduiza Spain
Toni G.L.A. van der Meer Netherlands
Amber E. Boydstun relative to John G. Geer United States John G. Geer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
John G. Geer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber E. Boydstun

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber E. Boydstun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber E. Boydstun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber E. Boydstun more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber E. Boydstun

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber E. Boydstun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber E. Boydstun. The network helps show where Amber E. Boydstun may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber E. Boydstun, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber E. Boydstun Line = papers co-authored together Amber E. Boydstun links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001188
2 2013175
3 2014128
4 2015126
5 202095
6 201493
7 201346
8 201744
9 201244
10 201838
11 201637
12 201736
13
Identifying Media Frames and Frame Dynamics Within and Across Policy Issues
201332
14 201631
15 201429
16 200828
17 201327
18 201323
19 201823
20 201721

About Amber E. Boydstun

Amber E. Boydstun is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Sociology and Political Science, General Social Sciences and Strategy and Management, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (16 papers), Social Media and Politics (14 papers), Media Studies and Communication (12 papers), Media Influence and Politics (9 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (8 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (6 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (6 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (491 citations), General Social Sciences (166 citations), Political Science and International Relations (500 citations), Sociology and Political Science (638 citations) and Strategy and Management (217 citations). Amber E. Boydstun has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca A. Glazier, Frank R. Baumgartner, Justin H. Gross, Herschel F. Thomas, Shaun Bevan, Dallas Card, Stefaan Walgrave, Anne Hardy, Noah A. Smith and Philip Resnik. Their work appears in journals such as Political Communication, Research & Politics, PS Political Science & Politics, Policy Studies Journal and American Politics Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact