P. J. E. Kail
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 17
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 11
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 5
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 3
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 3
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 4
- Historical Philosophy and Science 3
P. J. E. Kail
27 papers receiving 177 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Philosophy 208
- History and Philosophy of Science 66
- Political Science and International Relations 81
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 37
- General Social Sciences 8
Countries citing papers authored by P. J. E. Kail
This map shows the geographic impact of P. J. E. Kail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. J. E. Kail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. J. E. Kail more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P. J. E. Kail
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. J. E. Kail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. J. E. Kail. The network helps show where P. J. E. Kail may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 23 | |
| 4 | Hume’s Theory of Causation: A Quasi-Realist Interpretation | 2007 | 21 |
| 5 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 9 | Hutcheson's Moral Sense: Skepticism, Realism, and Secondary Qualities | 2001 | 8 |
| 10 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 2 |
About P. J. E. Kail
P. J. E. Kail is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, General Social Sciences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (11 papers), Hume's philosophy and hair distribution (5 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (208 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (66 citations), Political Science and International Relations (81 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (37 citations) and General Social Sciences (8 citations). P. J. E. Kail has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal for the History of Philosophy, European Journal of Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly, Mind and Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.