Benjamin Alamar

623 citations
24 papers · 461 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Alamar

22 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Benjamin Alamar
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Physiology 202
  • General Decision Sciences 12
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 40
  • Economics and Econometrics 125
Replace Douglas Coate with:
Douglas Coate United States
Frank Houghton Ireland
Hemant Kassean Mauritius
Jesús García Mayor Spain
Abraham Brown United Kingdom
Yijing Xiao China
Fritz Laux Germany
Karen O’Brien United States
Tinh Doan Australia
Judy Li New Zealand
Benjamin Alamar relative to Douglas Coate United States Douglas Coate's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Douglas Coate · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Alamar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Alamar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Alamar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Alamar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Alamar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Alamar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Alamar. The network helps show where Benjamin Alamar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Alamar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Alamar Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Alamar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006150
2 200667
3 200446
4 200539
5 200735
6 201332
7
Reliability of the sitting hand press-up test for identifying and quantifying the level of scapular medial border posterior displacement in overhead athletes.
201115
8 200614
9 201310
10 20068
11 20108
12 20087
13 20136
14 20045
15
Cigarette Smuggling in California: Fact and Fiction
20034
16 20064
17
Smoking in Restaurants: A Reply to David Henderson
20073
18 20112
19 20052
20 20061

About Benjamin Alamar

Benjamin Alamar is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Physiology, Management Information Systems, Clinical Psychology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (6 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (6 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (3 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (3 papers), Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics (2 papers), Housing Market and Economics (2 papers), Sports Performance and Training (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (202 citations), General Decision Sciences (12 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (40 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (125 citations). Benjamin Alamar has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stanton A. Glantz, Dean S. Oliver, Junggi Hong and Bill Gerrard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, Tobacco Control, American Journal of Public Health, Journal of Sport Management and Sport Management Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact