Benjamin A. Elman

3.3k citations
100 papers · 1.9k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin A. Elman

82 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Benjamin A. Elman
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Cultural Studies 411
  • History and Philosophy of Science 200
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
  • Anthropology 259
  • Demography 148
Replace Gyan Prakash with:
Gyan Prakash United States
Rey Chow United States
Timothy Brook Canada
Jonathan D. Spence United States
Marcus Rediker United States
Prasenjit Duara United States
Irā Berlin United States
Akira Iriye United States
Harry Harootunian United States
Antoinette Burton United States
Benjamin A. Elman relative to Gyan Prakash United States Gyan Prakash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Gyan Prakash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin A. Elman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin A. Elman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin A. Elman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin A. Elman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin A. Elman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin A. Elman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin A. Elman. The network helps show where Benjamin A. Elman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin A. Elman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin A. Elman Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin A. Elman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001204
2 2005170
3 1987135
4 2013109
5
Rethinking Confucianism : past and present in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam
2002105
6 1991100
7 198488
8 198665
9 200662
10
On Their Own Terms
200555
11 201046
12 200042
13 199337
14 200435
15 200233
16 201329
17 200829
18 198927
19 201824
20 201423

About Benjamin A. Elman

Benjamin A. Elman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 100 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (56 papers), Japanese History and Culture (15 papers), History of Science and Medicine (6 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (411 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (200 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.2k citations), Anthropology (259 citations) and Demography (148 citations). Benjamin A. Elman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and China. Frequent co-authors include John D. Langlois, Stephen Durrant, Herman Ooms, D. W. Y. Kwok, Kwang-Ching Liu, D. Portalez, Alexander Woodside, Bernard Malavaud, Martin Kern and Patrick Mouly. Their work appears in journals such as Late imperial China, The Journal of Asian Studies, The American Historical Review, T oung Pao and Journal of Early Modern History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact