Late imperial China

290 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 290 papers published in Late imperial China in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Late imperial China usually cover Sociology and Political Science (265 papers), Cultural Studies (114 papers) and Anthropology (62 papers) specifically the topics of Chinese history and philosophy (259 papers), Japanese History and Culture (112 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Late imperial China are Pamela Kyle Crossley, Angela Ki Che Leung, Ellen Widmer, Charlotte Furth, G. William Skinner, Frederic Wakeman, Stevan Harrell, William T. Rowe, Helen F. Siu and Hans Ulrich Vogel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Late imperial China

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Late imperial China. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Late imperial China.

Countries where authors publish in Late imperial China

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Late imperial China. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Late imperial China with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Late imperial China more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025